|
|
Post by Joey Costello on Nov 16, 2013 9:56:47 GMT -5
Are you in favour of allowing "elbow bumps" whereby if a person's elbow lifts vertically off the pad without gaining an advantage. If the elbow comes off in the winning or losing position it is still a foul.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eric Roussin on Nov 16, 2013 10:14:57 GMT -5
yes
|
|
|
|
Post by Joey Costello on Nov 16, 2013 10:36:02 GMT -5
I don't think this is a good idea.
Because right now if it is up the call is easy to see.
But how hard will it be for the ref to make a split second call on is it to high or not to high, did he gain an advantage or not, is it in the center or off to one side
|
|
|
|
Post by Chantal Leduc on Nov 16, 2013 16:52:19 GMT -5
This will turn into subjective mayhem..... a foul is a foul. Unless WAF decides to go this way i think it should be left alone.
|
|
|
|
Post by Evan Bourgoin on Nov 16, 2013 20:49:12 GMT -5
i say get rid of the little fouls. i never got to see alot of good matches because of them
|
|
|
|
Post by Dave Campbell on Nov 17, 2013 6:28:59 GMT -5
yes
|
|
|
|
Post by Maksim Khodau on Nov 18, 2013 15:34:38 GMT -5
This one is tough... I hate seeing great matches stop because of insignificant "elbow foul" calls... However, Chantel has a good point: a lot will be left up to referee's subjective discretion...
I think the benefit of increased spectator-value may outweigh the problem with determining what is an "elbow bump" and what is a foul...
I would say "yes" to the change.
|
|
